![]()
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/liznotes.html
I tend to think a lot of the psychs interested in sex crimes and issues are interested in it because they have some "issues" themselves in that department, but be that as it may. See article in the Sun Sentinel, Sex predators unleashed: Florida sets rapists and child molesters free to strike again. An eight-month investigation by the Sun Sentinel found that "At least 594 offenders reviewed under the law and let go have been convicted of a new sex offense in Florida. Nearly one quarter of them attacked again within six months of being released." This is directly contrary to psychs' claims of low recidivism rates. And every single one released was recommended released by one or more psychs. "And these numbers do not paint a complete picture. They do not include men convicted in other states or federal court, those who committed non-sexual violent crimes such as murder or home invasion, and those arrested but still awaiting trial for new sex crimes." Stop with the pretense of "treatment" already. Stop with the psychs. There is no "treatment" (let alone sex pervert treatment by sexually confused psychs). There is no evaluation or prediction. There is no crystal ball. Put these assholes in jail. To punish them. And to keep them away from the rest of us for as long as possible. (Yes, okay, look carefully at the statutory rape laws and similar, so we don't have to hear about very young men and their slightly younger girlfriends suffering travesties, and other psych-lobby horror stories.) But then lock up the creeps and perverts, and monitor them for life. And tell the sex positivist psychs to go rehabilitate themselves -- into a more productive field.
From the article in the Daily Caller: Daily Caller: How are those who disagree with you on the strategy distorting your views on this?
Dan Bongino (we so need him in Congress) wrote an excellent article today in the Washington Times. Excerpt: Ten months after the horrific tragedy in Benghazi, Libya, when terrorists attacked the U.S. Consulate and killed four Americans...
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong."
What alternative outcome would the opponents of Stand-Your-Ground desire? That the defending victim of the aggressor be the one that was killed? Or perhaps merely maimed? Raped, Beaten down?
And think about this: "One of the most important, and remarkably under-publicized facts that came out at trial is that one of the detectives, while interrogating Zimmerman at the police station that night, told him that the entire incident had been caught on surveillance video. The detective was bluffing, but Zimmerman didn't know that. His reaction: "Thank God". And about the ridiculous (and dangerous) anti-"Stand Your Ground" crap, read THIS.
See Robert Stacey McCain: How a Miami School Crime Cover-up Policy Led to Trayvon Martin's Death. Or perhaps instead of blaming the school, his parents ought to be charged with child neglect.
(Breitbart has a good analysis of the media circus, stoking a hoped-for unrest and racial theme.) Now let's see some bar complaints and a civil lawsuit for abuse of process and the post-verdict defamation. Meanwhile, an interesting analysis from last year of the race baiters:
Notwithstanding the worst economy since the Great Depression (and not getting better), Obama parties and vacations like no president has done before.
NYTimes OpEd combines biting truths with obfuscating suck-up ("heroes"?) about psychology and psychiatry: "...If the authors of the psychiatry manual want to invent a new disease, they should put Physics Envy in their handbook. The desire to be more like the hard sciences has distorted economics, education, political science, psychiatry and other behavioral fields. It's led practitioners to claim more knowledge than they can possibly have. It's devalued a certain sort of hybrid mentality that is better suited to these realms, the mentality that has one foot in the world of science and one in the liberal arts, that involves bringing multiple vantage points to human behavior..." PDF(But a "mentality" whose opining should not be admitted as "evidence" in any court of law).
|
SITE - INDEX |
LIZNOTES MAIN PAGE |
COLLECTIONS | WOMENS HISTORY LIBRARY
| RESEARCH ROOMS
| THE READING ROOM
FATHERLESS CHILDREN STORIES
| THERAPEUTIC JURISPRUDENCE
| WOMAN SUFFRAGE
TIMELINE | THE LIZ LIBRARY
ENTRANCE
Except
as otherwise noted, all contents in this collection are copyright 1996-2013
the liz library. All rights
reserved.
This site is hosted and maintained by argate.net
Send queries to: sarah-at-thelizlibrary.org